JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE OF SCHEMATIC SOLUTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPTIONS FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF ON-BOARD EQUIPMENT OF MILITARY AIRCRAFT

JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE OF SCHEMATIC SOLUTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPTIONS FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF ON-BOARD EQUIPMENT OF MILITARY AIRCRAFT

Authors

  • Viktor Erko State Research Institute of Aviation
  • Andrii Shatrov State Research Aviation Institute
  • Mychailo Shishanov Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine
  • Andrei Veretnov Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2023.3(39).49-55

Keywords:

aircraft equipment, multi-criteria choice, military aircraft, many Pareto set, modernization of military aircraft

Abstract

The article presents a methodological approach to the justification and selection of options for the modernization of on-board equipment of military aircraft based on the application of multi-criteria selection methods. An analysis of the global development of military aircraft showed that an economically beneficial direction for increasing their combat capabilities is the modernization of on-board equipment (aiming-navigation and reconnaissance systems, communication systems, registration of flight information, etc.), while choosing one or another variant of the composition of the on-board equipment is to a large extent key in its implementation. Analytical substantiation of the revealed dependence of the results of the application of the mentioned methods on the power of the set of Pareto variants is proposed, and the results of the analysis of the criteria for the placement of on-board equipment on board a military aircraft by optimizing the communication network between the components of this on-board equipment are given. With this approach, the function of the methodical apparatus is reduced to the selection from a set of possible options for choosing those alternatives that do not have advantages over others, and the function of direct selection among the remaining competitive options is entrusted to the person responsible for making the final decision. With this approach, the function of the methodical apparatus is reduced to the selection from a set of possible options for choosing those alternatives that do not have advantages over others, and the function of direct selection among the remaining competitive options is entrusted to the person responsible for making the final decision. At the same time, the applied criteria relate to general technical and economic properties and are important for ensuring the desired level of combat and flight qualities of the aircraft. The practical application of the proposed approach will allow to significantly reduce the influence of the subjective factor in the decision-making system regarding the selection of onboard equipment military aircraft due to algorithmization and programming of the selection procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Viktor Erko, State Research Institute of Aviation

Candidate of Technical Sciences

Andrii Shatrov, State Research Aviation Institute

Candidate of Technical Sciences

Mychailo Shishanov, Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Andrei Veretnov, Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine

Candidate of Technical Sciences

References

Air Force. Офіціальний сайт уряду USA. B-52 Stratofortress. Режим доступу: https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104465/b-52h-stratofortress/.

Staff Writer. Boeing B-52 Stratofortress. High Altitude, Long-Range Strategic Heavy Bomber [1955]. Military Factory. 08/06/2022. Режим доступу: https:// www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.php?aircraft_ id=19.

John A. Tirpak. How a Rusty B-52 Carcass Is Key to the Bomber’s Big Upgrades. Air & Space Forces Magazine. May 24, 2023. Режим доступу: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/rusty-b-52-carcass-upgrades/.

Air Force. Офіціальний сайт уряду USA. F-16 Falcon. Режим доступу: https://www-af-mil.translate.goog/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104505/f-16-fighting-falcon/.

John A. Tirpak. First F-16 Block 70 Emerges From Lockheed Martin’s New Factory—128 More on Order. Air & Space Forces Magazine. Nov. 22, 2022. Режим доступу: https:// www.airandspaceforces.com/first-f-16-block-70-emerges-from-lockheed-martins-new-factory-128-more-on-order/.

Rosita Mickeviciute. F-16 Fighting Falcon: a comprehensive look at the aircraft and its features. Aerotime Hub. Transport and telecommunication institute. University of the West of England. 2023-05-15. Режим доступу: https:// www.aerotime.aero/articles/f-16-fighting-falcon-a-comprehensive-look-at-the-aircraft-and-its-features.

Бурковський С.І., Смик С.І., Півнєв Д.А. Досяжний рівень модернізації літаків МиГ-21. Системи озброєння і військова техніка. Харків: Харківський ун-т Повітряних Сил імені Івана Кожедуба. 2011. № 1(25). С. 8—11.

Kononov, O., Yerko, V., & Shatrov, A. (2022). Rational placement of on-board equipment of combat aircraft when they are upgraded. Scientific Col. «InterConf+». № 25(125). Рр. 242—249. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.09.2022.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.09.2022.022

Основы военно-технических исследований. Теория и приложения. Т. 4. Методология исследования сложных систем военного назначения: монография / Шишанов М.А., Лапицкий С.В., Кучинский А.В., Оленович И.Ф., Чепков И.Б., Васьковский М.И., ГурновичА.В., Бисык С.П., Куприненко А.Н. Киев: Издательский дом Дмитрия Бураго. 2013. 250 с.

Воронин А.Н., Зиатдинов Ю.К, Куклинский М.В. Многокритериальные решения: модели и методы. Київ: Нац. авіац. ун-т. 2011. 348 с.

Артюшин Л.М., Кононов О.А., Єрко В.Б. Визначення результуючої множини варіантів при багатокритеріальному виборі складу бортового обладнання бойових літальних апаратів для їх модернізації. Зб. наук. пр. ДНДІА. 2021. № 17(24). С. 20—26. https://doi.org/10.54858/dndia/2021-17-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54858/dndia.2021-17-3

Kononov, O., Yerko, V., Shatrov, A., & Shishanov, M. (2023). Analysis of the scientific and methodological apparatus for selecting the option of onboard equipment for military aircraft. Scientific Col. «InterConf+». № 31(147). Рр. 637—644. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.03.2023.067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.03.2023.067

Медведєв Г.А., Пономаренко С.О. Напрямки підвищення розвідувального потенціалу літаків-розвідників шляхом їх модернізації. Озброєння та військова техніка. Київ: ЦНДІ ОВТ ЗСУ. 2019. № 2(22). С. 64—66. https://doi.org/1034169/2414-0651.2019.2(22).64-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.2(22).64-66

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Erko, V., Shatrov, A., Shishanov, M., & Veretnov, A. (2023). JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE OF SCHEMATIC SOLUTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPTIONS FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF ON-BOARD EQUIPMENT OF MILITARY AIRCRAFT. Weapons and Military Equipment, 39(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2023.3(39).49-55

Issue

Section

AIRCRAFT ARMAMENT & FACILITIES
Loading...