The evaluation of weighting factors of armored personnel carriers characteristics according to the questionnaire with usage of method of paired comparisons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.2(22).42-49Keywords:
directions of development, expert survey, the method of pairwise comparison, armored combat vehicles, armored personnel carrierAbstract
The paper presents the results of evaluation of directions of increasing the characteristics of an armored personnel carrier according to the survey data using the method of pairwise comparison. A total of 88 experts were polled. For pair comparison, twelve issues have been identified that characterize the main indicators of an armored personnel carrier: security, mobility, and firepower. In addition, experts were asked questions regarding the general characteristics of APCs. The obtained values of the weight ratios of the parameters of the armored personnel carrier indicate that the most important for experts are the characteristics of weapons, security (mitigation protection, protection against hand grenade anti-grenade launcher grenades, protection against balls B-32 caliber 12,7mm) and permeability. The obtained values of importance of the indicators of the armored personnel carrier according to the survey data using the method of pair comparison are the basis for assessing the priorities of development of domestic armored personnel carriers and other cars of this class.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Polehenko, A. F., Krukovskyi-Sinevych, K. B. (2011) "Metod analizu iyerarkhiy: deyaki aspekty praktychnoho zastosuvannya” [The Analytic Hierarchy Process], Collection of scientific works CSRI AME AF of Ukraine, p. 152.
2. Juravskyi, S. V. (2018) “Metodyka vyznachennya zalezhnosti maksymalnoho rivnya efektyvnosti bronezhyleta vid yoho ploshchi” [Method of determining the dependence of the maximum level of efficiency of armor regarding its area], Weapons And Military Equipment, No. 2(18), p. 32-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2018.2(18).32-37
3. Velychko, M. A., Yudin, V. A., Krasnikov, Ye. K.(1997) “Struktura bezpovorotnykh vtrat v suchasnykh zbroynykh konfliktakh”, [The Structure of Irrecoverable Losses in the Modern Armed Conflict], Military and Medical Journal, No. 1, pp. 64–68.
4. Gumanenko, E. K., Samokhina, I. M. (2011) “Voyennopolevaya khirurgiya lokal’nykh voyn i vooruzhennykh konfliktov : rukovodstvo dlya vrachey”, [Military Surgery of Local Wars and Armed Conflict: Manual for Doctors], GEO-TAR-Media, Moscow, 672 p.
5. Bisyk, S. P., Davydovskyi, L. S., Shabitskyi, V. R. (2015) “Kry`terii travmuvannya organizmu lyudy`ny` pry` udarnomu ta vy`buxovomu navantazhennyax” [Criteria of Injury of Human Body in Shock and Explosive Loads], Armament Systems and Military Equipment: Scientific Journal, No.1(41), pp. 153-159.
6. Bisyk, S. P., Davydovskyi, L. S. (2015) “Analiz mekhanohenezu travmuvannia ekipazhu boiovykh bronovanykh mashyn pry pidryvi na minno-vybukhovykh prystroiakh”, [The Analysis of the Mechanogenesis of the Trauma of a Crew of Armored Combat Vehicles in Case of Blasting on Mine Explosive Devices], The Military Technical Collection of Works, No. 13, pp. 34–40.
7. Davydovskyi, L. S., Bisyk, S. P. (2018) “Vyznachennia napriamiv pidvyshchennia zakhyshchenosti boiovykh bronovanykh mashyn na osnovi analizu boiovykh urazhen”, [Determination of Drections for Increasing the Defense of Armored Combat Vehicles on the Basis of the Analysis of Combat Lesions], Collection of scientific works CSRI AME AF of Ukraine, No. 1(68), pp. 34–40.
8. Bisyk, S. P., Chepkov, I. B., Vaskivskyi, M. I., Davydovskyi, L. S., Korbach, V. H., Vysotskyi, O. M., Zakharevych, D. M., (2016) “Teoretychna otsinka protyminnoi stiikosti bahatotsilovoho taktychnoho avtomobilia «Kozak-2»”, [The Theoretical Assessment of the Antimine Stability of the Multi-purpose Tactical Car «Kozak-2»], Weapons and Military Equipment, No. 1(9), pp. 26–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2016.1(9).26-31
9. Kuprinenko, O. M., Holub, V. A., (2009) “Obhruntuvannia taktyko-tekhnichnykh vymoh do perspektyvnykh zrazkiv ozbroiennia ta viiskovoi tekhniky z vykorystanniam nechitkykh mnozhyn”, [ The Substantiation of Tactical and Technical Requirements for Promising Weapons and Military Equipment using Fuzzy Sets.], The Military Technical Collection of Works, No. 1, pp. 43–46.
10. Kuprynenko, O. N., Holub, V. A. (2013) “Syntez varyantov proektnykh hypotez tekhnycheskoho oblyka perspektyvnukh typov boevukh bronyrovannukh mashyn”, [The Synthesis of Variants of the Design Hypotheses of the Technical Appearance of Promising Types of Armored Combat Vehicles], The Military Technical Collection of Works, No. 2(9), pp. 36-42.
11. Kuprinenko, O. M., Holub, V. A. (2013) “Obgruntuvannia propozytsii shchodo vyboru typu rushiia perspektyvnykh boiovykh bronovanykh mashyn z urakhuvanniam heohrafi chnykh umov Ukrainy”, [The Substantiation of Suggestions on the Choice of the Type of Engine for Advanced Combat Armored Vehicles Taking into Account the Geographical Conditions of Ukraine], Collection of scientific works CSRI AME AF of Ukraine, No. 2(49). pp. 105-115..
12. Saaty, T. L. The analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. – New-York, 1980.
13. Beshelev, S. D., Gurvich, F. G. (1980), “Matematikostatisticheskiye metody ekspertnykh otsenok”, [Mathematical and Statistical Methods of Expert Evaluations], Statistica, Moscow, 260 p.
2. Juravskyi, S. V. (2018) “Metodyka vyznachennya zalezhnosti maksymalnoho rivnya efektyvnosti bronezhyleta vid yoho ploshchi” [Method of determining the dependence of the maximum level of efficiency of armor regarding its area], Weapons And Military Equipment, No. 2(18), p. 32-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2018.2(18).32-37
3. Velychko, M. A., Yudin, V. A., Krasnikov, Ye. K.(1997) “Struktura bezpovorotnykh vtrat v suchasnykh zbroynykh konfliktakh”, [The Structure of Irrecoverable Losses in the Modern Armed Conflict], Military and Medical Journal, No. 1, pp. 64–68.
4. Gumanenko, E. K., Samokhina, I. M. (2011) “Voyennopolevaya khirurgiya lokal’nykh voyn i vooruzhennykh konfliktov : rukovodstvo dlya vrachey”, [Military Surgery of Local Wars and Armed Conflict: Manual for Doctors], GEO-TAR-Media, Moscow, 672 p.
5. Bisyk, S. P., Davydovskyi, L. S., Shabitskyi, V. R. (2015) “Kry`terii travmuvannya organizmu lyudy`ny` pry` udarnomu ta vy`buxovomu navantazhennyax” [Criteria of Injury of Human Body in Shock and Explosive Loads], Armament Systems and Military Equipment: Scientific Journal, No.1(41), pp. 153-159.
6. Bisyk, S. P., Davydovskyi, L. S. (2015) “Analiz mekhanohenezu travmuvannia ekipazhu boiovykh bronovanykh mashyn pry pidryvi na minno-vybukhovykh prystroiakh”, [The Analysis of the Mechanogenesis of the Trauma of a Crew of Armored Combat Vehicles in Case of Blasting on Mine Explosive Devices], The Military Technical Collection of Works, No. 13, pp. 34–40.
7. Davydovskyi, L. S., Bisyk, S. P. (2018) “Vyznachennia napriamiv pidvyshchennia zakhyshchenosti boiovykh bronovanykh mashyn na osnovi analizu boiovykh urazhen”, [Determination of Drections for Increasing the Defense of Armored Combat Vehicles on the Basis of the Analysis of Combat Lesions], Collection of scientific works CSRI AME AF of Ukraine, No. 1(68), pp. 34–40.
8. Bisyk, S. P., Chepkov, I. B., Vaskivskyi, M. I., Davydovskyi, L. S., Korbach, V. H., Vysotskyi, O. M., Zakharevych, D. M., (2016) “Teoretychna otsinka protyminnoi stiikosti bahatotsilovoho taktychnoho avtomobilia «Kozak-2»”, [The Theoretical Assessment of the Antimine Stability of the Multi-purpose Tactical Car «Kozak-2»], Weapons and Military Equipment, No. 1(9), pp. 26–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2016.1(9).26-31
9. Kuprinenko, O. M., Holub, V. A., (2009) “Obhruntuvannia taktyko-tekhnichnykh vymoh do perspektyvnykh zrazkiv ozbroiennia ta viiskovoi tekhniky z vykorystanniam nechitkykh mnozhyn”, [ The Substantiation of Tactical and Technical Requirements for Promising Weapons and Military Equipment using Fuzzy Sets.], The Military Technical Collection of Works, No. 1, pp. 43–46.
10. Kuprynenko, O. N., Holub, V. A. (2013) “Syntez varyantov proektnykh hypotez tekhnycheskoho oblyka perspektyvnukh typov boevukh bronyrovannukh mashyn”, [The Synthesis of Variants of the Design Hypotheses of the Technical Appearance of Promising Types of Armored Combat Vehicles], The Military Technical Collection of Works, No. 2(9), pp. 36-42.
11. Kuprinenko, O. M., Holub, V. A. (2013) “Obgruntuvannia propozytsii shchodo vyboru typu rushiia perspektyvnykh boiovykh bronovanykh mashyn z urakhuvanniam heohrafi chnykh umov Ukrainy”, [The Substantiation of Suggestions on the Choice of the Type of Engine for Advanced Combat Armored Vehicles Taking into Account the Geographical Conditions of Ukraine], Collection of scientific works CSRI AME AF of Ukraine, No. 2(49). pp. 105-115..
12. Saaty, T. L. The analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. – New-York, 1980.
13. Beshelev, S. D., Gurvich, F. G. (1980), “Matematikostatisticheskiye metody ekspertnykh otsenok”, [Mathematical and Statistical Methods of Expert Evaluations], Statistica, Moscow, 260 p.
Downloads
Published
2019-06-25
How to Cite
Aristarkhov, O., Bisyk, S., & Slyusar, V. (2019). The evaluation of weighting factors of armored personnel carriers characteristics according to the questionnaire with usage of method of paired comparisons. Weapons and Military Equipment, 22(2), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.2(22).42-49
Issue
Section
ARMORED VEHICLES
