Modernization of the production potential and technical refurbishment of the enterprises of the defense industrial complex as the primary stage of its next clusterization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2025.3(47).3-10Keywords:
defense-industrial complex, new economic policy of Ukraine, global experience of post-war economic growthAbstract
In the conditions of the aggression of the russian federation, intensive military operations and limited budgetary resources, Ukrainian defense and military enterprises faced a difficult dilemma: whether it is more expedient in the short term to modernize the existing production potential, is it necessary to direct efforts and funds to radical technical rearmament in order to ensure long-term technological superiority? This problem became particularly relevant during 2022–2024, when due to the critical need for operational supply of weapons to the Armed Forces, enterprises were often forced to abandon the previously planned development of high-tech samples and instead returned to the production of products that were developed more than 25–35 years ago.
That is, an alternative approach to full modernization can be the selective rearmament of only critical links of technological chains, where modernization for economic reasons is more expedient compared to the continued use of outdated technologies. To formalize this problem, the authors use a mathematical model in the form of an optimization problem with two alternatives. The main goal of the model is to maximize the overall effect or utility of the investment, taking into account costs, resource constraints and expected results.
In the article, the authors combine a formalized approach with empirical insights, which allows for reasonable decision-making regarding the technological trajectory of the development of defense industry enterprises in the conditions of war and post-war recovery. The initially built model can become the basis for the development of strategic modernization programs, the formation of state investment priorities and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of resources in the sphere of the defense-industrial complex of Ukraine.
Downloads
References
Чепков, І., Гусєв, Ю., Зірка, М., & Гаврилюк, І. (2024). Стратегічна ідея екосистеми озброєння України. Озброєння та військова техніка, 44(4), 3–12.
https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2024.4(44).3-12
Чепков, І., Гусєв, Ю., Зірка, М., & Поліщук, О. (2025). СКЛАДОВІ МАЙБУТНЬОЇ ЕКОСИСТЕМИ ОЗБРОЄННЯ УКРАЇНИ. Озброєння та військова техніка, 46(2), 3–15.
https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2025.2(46).3-15
Кондратєв Г.М. (2009). Основы теории оптимальных решений. М.: Наука. 312 с.
Щукіна Н.В. Модели оптимального управления : учеб. пособие. М. : Наука. 2004. 456 с.
Козарєв А.В., Мерзлікін В.М. Теория принятия решений : учебник. М. : Академический проэкт. 2008. 384 с.
Яковенко І.В. Теория игр и моделирование стратегического поведения : учебник. СПб. : Питер. 2007. 528 с.
Лосєв В.А. Информационные модели в управлении : учеб. пособие. М. : Инфра-М. 2010. 400 с.
Українська оборонна промисловість. АТ «Українська оборонна промисловість». Звіт заступника Генерального директора з виробництва. Київ. 2025. 17 с.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ігор Чепков,Юрій Гусєв

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.