Retraction Policy

ARTICLE RETRACTION POLICY

of the Scientific Journal "Armament and Military Equipment"

  1. General Provisions

1.1. This Policy establishes the procedure for the withdrawal (retraction) of articles published in the journal "Armament and Military Equipment," in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

1.2. The purpose of retraction is to correct misleading published information and ensure the integrity of scientific publications, rather than to punish authors.

1.3. Retraction may be initiated by the authors, the journal editorial office, readers, or authorized persons of institutions.

  1. Grounds for Article Retraction

2.1. Established fact of plagiarism or unlawful borrowing of materials.

2.2. Presence of significant errors in the study that render its results or conclusions incorrect.

2.3. Duplicate publication (self-plagiarism) without proper reference to the primary source.

2.4. Falsification, fabrication, or intentional manipulation of data.

2.5. Undisclosed conflict of interest that could have influenced the interpretation of results.

2.6. Violation of ethical norms during the research process.

2.7. Identification of restricted information in the article that poses a threat to national security (specific to this publication).

2.8. Authorship violations: inclusion of individuals who made no contribution, or exclusion of those who did.

2.9. Compromised peer review: identification of fictitious or low-quality peer review.

2.10. Redundant publication: submitting the same article to another publication without proper justification.

2.11. Conflict of interest: presence of conflicts that realistically influenced or could have influenced the reliability of results.

  1. Initiation and Review Procedure

3.1. The initiator submits a written application to the Editor-in-Chief with a detailed justification and evidence.

3.2. The Editor-in-Chief conducts a preliminary check within 5 working days. If the claims are substantiated, a commission of three independent experts is established.

3.3. The commission conducts a comprehensive analysis within 30 calendar days. Authors are granted the mandatory right to provide their explanations.

3.4. The commission makes one of the following decisions:

  1. Formatting and Technical Requirements for Retraction

4.1. In the event of a retraction, the article is marked as "retracted" in all versions of the journal.

4.2. PDF Marking: A "RETRACTED" watermark is applied to every page of the original PDF file. The article remains on the website to preserve the scientific record but is accompanied by an active link to the Retraction Notice.

4.3. DOI: The original article's DOI identifier is preserved but redirects the user to the Retraction Notice.

4.4. The Retraction Notice includes:

  1. Consequences and Rights of the Parties

5.1. Authors, scientometric databases (Scopus, Web of Science, etc.), and the authors' affiliated institutions are officially notified of the retraction.

5.2. The notice is published in the nearest printed and electronic issue of the journal in Open Access.

5.3. Appeal: Authors have the right to submit an appeal to the Editor-in-Chief within 14 days after receiving the decision. The appeal is considered by the editorial office within 14 days; the decision resulting from the appeal is final.

RETRACTION NOTICE

Notice Publication Date: [DD.MM.YYYY]

Regarding the Article: [Full Title of the Article]

Authors: [Last Names and Initials of all Authors]

Journal: "Armament and Military Equipment," [Year], [Volume], [Issue Number], [Pages]

Article DOI: [Link to the DOI of the original article]

Description of Decision

The Editorial Board of the journal "Armament and Military Equipment," in conjunction with the publisher, has decided to retract the aforementioned article.

Reason for Retraction:

[Select one or more options and provide details]:

Detailed Explanation:

[Provide a brief description of the investigation here, e.g., "During an internal review, the commission found that Figure 3 was duplicated from a previously published work by another author without permission" or "The authors informed the editorial office of an unintentional error in the software code that led to a 40% distortion of the modeling results"].

Authors' Position

Consequences

This article remains in the journal's electronic archive to ensure the integrity of the scientific record; however, a "RETRACTED" watermark has been applied to every page of the PDF file. The editorial office requests that the scientific community refrain from using the results of this article or citing it in future works.

Signatures

Editor-in-Chief: ____________________ / [Last Name, Initials]

Chair of the Expert Commission: _______________ / [Last Name, Initials]

Would you like me to translate any other documents related to your journal's compliance with the new Ministry of Education and Science standards?

 

Loading...