УПРАВЛІННЯ ОБОРОННИМИ РЕСУРСАМИ: ДОСВІД США

Vladyslav Sotnyk; Viktoriia Sotnyk

doi:10.34169/2414-0651.2023.4(40).3-8

Governance in defense resources management: experience of the United States

Authors

Vladyslav Sotnyk Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine
Viktoriia Sotnyk Center for Military and Strategic Studies of the National Defense University of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0507-2348

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2023.4(40).3-8

Keywords:

management of defense resources, state bodies, experience of the USA, norms of state budgeting

Abstract

The article considers the peculiarities of state management of defense resources from the standpoints of micro-budgeting and macro-budgeting. The attention is focused on the regulatory framework, which contributes to the effective management of defense resources. The administrative rules and specifics of the organizational structure of the defense management system are considered as well. The institutional norms, which are established in the estimation of efficiency of management of defense resources, are investigated, in particular, the norms of state budgeting are analyzed in detail. These are perspective directions of management of defense resources according to the experience of the United States, among which were singled out: change of the regulatory framework, administrative rules, organizational structure and attraction of additional financial resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vladyslav Sotnyk, Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Senior Research

Viktoriia Sotnyk, Center for Military and Strategic Studies of the National Defense University of Ukraine

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Senior Researcher

References

This is a slightly modified version of the definition in Heinrich, C.J., & Lynn Jr, L.E. (Eds.). 2000. Governance and Performance: New Perspectives. Georgetown Univ. Press.

Candreva, P.J. (2019). The federal Antideficiency Act at 150 − where do we stand? Public Budgeting & Finance. № 39(4). Рр. 75—93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12237

Poling, S.A. (2017). U.S. Forest Service—Line-Item Appropriation for Acquiring Aircraft for the Next-Generation Airtanker Fleet. (GAO B-328323). Government Accountability Office.

Poling, S.A. (2017). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Statutory Restrictions on the Use of Appropriated Funds for Welded Shipboard Anchor and Mooring Chain. (GAO B-328485). Government Accountability Office.

Krause, H. (2017). Budget Issues: Budget Uncertainty and Disruptions Affect Timing of Agency Spending. (GAO17-807T). Government Accountability Office; and DeBruyne, N.F. (2020). Defense Authorization and Appropriations Bills: FY1961-FY2020. (CRS Report No. 98-756). Congressional Research Service.

Department of Defense (2020). Financial Management Regulations. Available at: https://comptroller.defense.gov/FMR/.

Max Weber and His Theory of Bureaucracy. (2006). In Miner, J.B. Organizational Behavior 3: Historical Origins, Theoretical Foundations, and the Future, New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Levine, P. (2020). Defense Management Reform: How to Make the Pentagon Work Better and Cost Less. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503611856

United States Navy. (1990). U. S. Navy Regulations. Washington, DC: U.S. Navy. Available at: https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/navyregs.aspx Section 0802.3.

Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 6th ed., PMI: Newtown Square, PA and Frame, J. D. (2002). The New Project Management: Tools for an Age of Rapid Change, Complexity, and Other Business Realities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Tyler, C. (1993). Local government reserve funds: policy alternatives and political strategies. Public Budgeting & Finance. № 13(2). Pp. 75—84; Hendrick, R. (2006). The role of slack in local government finances. Public Budgeting & Finance. № 26(1). Pp. 14—46; and Schick, A. (2009). Budgeting for fiscal space. OECD J. on Budgeting. № 9(2). Pp. 7—24.

Section 809 Panel. (2019). Report of the Advisory Panel on Streamlining and Codifying Acquisition Regulations, Vol. 3. Arlington, VA. Р. 180. Available at: https://section809panel.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2019/01/Sec809Panel_Vol3-Report_JAN19_part-1_01-28.pdf.

Chung, A. & Rimal, R. N. (2016). Social Norms: A Review. Review of Communications Research. № 4. Р. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008

Wildavsky, A. & Caiden, N. (2001). The New Politics of the Budgetary Process, 4th ed. Longman: New York; Rubin, I. S. (1993). The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing, 2nd ed., Chatham House: Chatham, N.J., Jones, L.R., & Euske, K.J. (1991). Strategic misrepresentation in budgeting. J. of Public Administration Research and Theory. № 1(4). Pp. 437—460; Di Francesco, M., & Alford, J. (2016). Budget rules and flexibility in the public sector: towards a taxonomy. Financial Accountability & Management. № 32(2). Pp. 232—256.

Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge univ. press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477

Di Francesco, M., & Alford, J. (2016). Budget rules and flexibility in the public sector: towards a taxonomy. Financial Accountability & Management. № 32(2). Pp. 232—256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12087

Candreva, P.J. (2017). National Defense Budgeting and Financial Management: Policy & Practice. IAP and Marsalis, J.R. (2022). The Negative Impacts of the Benchmarks. Paper for Senior Acquisition Course. Nat. Defense Univ. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/979-8-88730-507-3