Technical and economic comparison of camouflage options for armored combat vehicle to increase its survivability when using technical reconnaissance means by the enemy

Technical and economic comparison of camouflage options for armored combat vehicle to increase its survivability when using technical reconnaissance means by the enemy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2020.4(28).98-103

Keywords:

armored combat vehicle, increasing survivability, camouflage, alternatives to camoufl age military vehicles, radio-absorbing ferrite materials, technical means of reconnaissance, technical and economic comparison

Abstract

This article proposes a methodology for assessing the results of a technical and economic comparison of camouflage options for an armored combat vehicle to maintain its functions during a march or position when an adversary uses active and passive systems of technical intelligence in the frequency ranges: in radar; infrared from thermal radiation; optical, as well as in the range of acoustic waves from engine noise, in order to damage the armored combat vehicle. For a tactical and economic comparison, mathematical calculations were performed on the basis of the proposed possible alternative masking options, ranging from the zero option (no masking) to the masking option simultaneously in five wavelengths (radar; infrared; optical; thermal; acoustic). A comparison is made of options that are carried out according to the criterion of “effi ciency-cost” for various alternatives to camoufl age an armored combat vehicle. When the enemy uses various types of reconnaissance equipment, it is proposed to use radar absorbing ferrite materials to reduce radar visibility, to protect information on the coordinates of the deployment and on the direction of movement of military automotive equipment, in the course of their intended use. In turn, this will increase the survivability of armored combat vehicle in general and allow them to perform combat missions with their artillery and anti-aircraft units, communications units, radiation, chemical and biological defense units, military aviation units and other units.
The introduction of the proposed methodology for a comparative quantitative assessment of the options for protecting an armored vehicle and choosing an acceptable one helps to better navigate the fi eld of possible decisions based on a comparative quantitative assessment of risks and wins when making a decision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Artem Kosenko, Military Academy

military postgraduate student
of Military Academy,
Odesa, Ukraine

Boris Demianchuk, Military Academy

Doсtor of Engineering Sciences, Professor
Head of Department of Military Academy,
Odesa, Ukraine

Anton Goncharuk, Research center of the Military academy

PhD (technical sciences), Senior Researcher,
the head of the Research center of the Military academy,
Odesa, Ukraine

Юрій Зуберович Артабаєв, Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine

Senior Research Associate of Central research institute of weapons and military equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Kuprinenko, O.M. (2012) “Obgruntuvannia pryntsypiv formuvannia perspektyvnykh typiv boyovykh bronovanykh mashyn” [Substantiation of the principles of formation of perspective types of combat armored vehicles], Weapons systems and military equipment. №4(32). Рр. 40—46.

Kovba, M.V. & Riy, V.B. (2020). “Obgruntuvannia tekhnichnykh rishen shchodo pidvyshchennia zhyvuchosti avtomobilnoi tekhniky Zbroynykh Syl Ukrainy” [Substantiation of technical solutions to increase the survivability of automotive equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine], Control, navigation and communication systems. Coll. of scient. works. №1(59). Рр. 54—58.

Bisyk, S.P., Kuprinenko, O.M. & Korbach, V.H. (2015) “Otsinka protyminnoi stiikosti lehkoi boyovoi kolisnoi mashyny” [Assessment of mine resistance of a light wheeled combat vehicle], Bull. of NTU “KhPI”. № 31. Рр. 11—20.

Lvova, L.A. (2003) “Radiolokatsionnaia zametnost letatelnykh apparatov” [Radar noticeability aircraft], RFNC-ARRITRNA. Snezhinsk. 232 p.

Masalov, S.A., Ryzhak, A.V., Sukharevsky, O.I. & Shkil, V.M. (1999) “Fizicheskie osnovy diapazonnykh tekhnologii tipa Stels” [Physical fundamentals of stealth range technology], MSA. SP. 250 p.

Sotnikov, O.M. (2009). “Otsinka viddzerkalyuyuchykh vlastyvostei nazemnykh i povitrianykh obektiv z pasyvnym zakhystom na osnovi kompozytnykh radioizotopnykh pokryt” [Evaluation of reflecting properties of ground and air objects with passive protection based on composite radioisotope coatings], Control, navigation and communication systems. №1(9). Рр. 70— 74.

Sukharevsky, O.I., Vasilets, V.A., Sazonov, A.Z. & Tkachuk, K.I. (2003). “Metod rascheta YEPR nazemnogo obyekta z neidealnoi otbivayushchei poverkhnostyu” [Method for calculating the ESR of a ground object with a non-ideal striking surface], Electromagnetic wave scattering. №12. Рр. 9—15.

Ministerstvo oborony SSSR (1977) “Sovetskaia voyennaia entsiklopediia [v 8 t.]. T. ІІІ” [Soviet military encyclopedia. [in 8 vol.]. Vol. III], M. Pр. 333—334.

Ministerstvo oborony Ukrainy (2016) “Boyovyi statut mekhanizovanykh i tankovykh viisk Sukhoputnykh viisk Zbroynykh Syl Ukrainy. Ch. ІІ” [Combat Charter of mechanized and tank troops of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. P. 2]. K. Рр. 213—214.

Demianchuk, B.О. (2006) “Materialy-peretvoryuvachi elektromahnitnoi enerhii v teplovu. Vymohy. Osnovy tekhnolohii” [Materials that convert electromagnetic energy into heat. Requirements. Fundamentals of technology], Technology and design in electronic equipment. №5. Рр. 31—35.

Menshova, S.B. (2016) “Tendencies in creating modern radio absorbing materials and coatings”, Reliability and Quality of Complex Systems. №4(16). Рр. 51—59.

Gorbik, P.P., Mahno, S.M., Dubrovіn, І.V., Abramov, M.V., Mіshchenko, V.M., Mazurenko, R.V., Petranovska, A.L., Pilipchuk, E.V. & Prokopenko, S.L. (2017) “Syntez i vlastyvosti nanostruktur, pohlynaiuchykh nadvysokochastotne elektromahnitne ta neitronne vyprominennia” [Synthesis and properties of nanostructures absorbing microwave electromagnetic and neutron radiation], Nanosystems, Nanomaterials, Nanotechnology. №1(15). Pp. 47—82.

Maslovsky, A.A., Lehenkyi, M.N., Demchenko, А.А. & Kolchigin, N.N. (2017) “Chastichnaia maskirovka obyektov slozhnoi formy s pomoshchiu radiopogloshchayushchikh materialov” [Partial masking of complex-shaped objects using radioabsorbing materials], Bull. of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv Nat. Univ. Ser. “Radiophysics and Electronics”. №27. Pp. 3—8.

Demianchuk, B.О. (2011) “Metod korektsii khvylovykh oporiv modyfi kovanykh radiozakhysnykh kompozytiv z heterohennymy napovnyuvachamy” [Method of correction of wave resistances of modified radioprotective composites with heterogeneous fillers], Coll. of scientifi c works of the Military Inst. of the Taras Shevchenko Kyiv Nat. Univ. № 31. Рр. 39—45.

Demianchuk, B.О. (2007) “Metod otsinky rivnia vidbyttia elektromahnitnykh khvyl vid bahatosharovoho pokryttia na metalevii pidlozhtsi” [Method for estimating the level of refl ection of electromagnetic waves from a multilayer coating on a metal substrate], Bull. of Lviv Nat. Univ. “Lviv Polytechnic”. № 592. Рр. 164—167.

Published

2022-02-17

How to Cite

Kosenko, A., Demianchuk, B., Goncharuk, A., & Артабаєв, Ю. З. (2022). Technical and economic comparison of camouflage options for armored combat vehicle to increase its survivability when using technical reconnaissance means by the enemy. Weapons and Military Equipment, 28(4), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2020.4(28).98-103
Loading...