Methodical approach to cost assessment of modernized armament on industrial enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2020.1(25).12-18Abstract
Method for assessment of modernized armament sample is described in paper. It permits to delete the contradictions between approached of industry and Defense ministry to that cost. Method is based on expert assessment of the samples characteristics importance and on the clear mathematical apparatus. Experts are ranking the sample characteristics only. The proposed mathematical apparatus provides the following calculation operations: calculation of the weight coefficients for characteristics; normalization of the technical indexes of sample under modernization (base one) and a same for modernized sample; calculation of summarized indexes of technical performance of these samples; distribution of base sample cost between characteristics groups (battle and auxiliary) proportionally to summarized indexes of its technical performance; distribution of cost of every characteristics group between indexes of base sample technical performance; calculation of every characteristic cost of modernized sample; determination of modernized sample cost as sum of costs its separate quality indexes. Two examples of this method application for assessment of cost of modernized artillery missile complex are considered in paper. In the first example, modernization deals with imperfection of alone characteristic. In the second example, modernization deals with imperfection of two characteristics – shooting distance and increasing of combat head mass by virtue worsening of other characteristics. There is proposed to use the well-known statistic data for forecast of both expenditures on the modernization works and operational expenditures for keeping of sample combat capability during its life cycle.
Downloads
References
Strategia natsionalnoj bezpeki Ukrainy (tretja red.) [Strategies of national safety of Ukraine], zatv. Ukazom Prezidenta Ukrainy vid 26 travnja 2015 roku, №287/2015. Ofitsijnyj visn. Ukrainy. 2015. №13. 50 p.
Voenna doktryna Ukrainy (chetverta red.) [Military doctrine of Ukraine], zatv. Ukazom Prezidenta Ukrainy vid 24.09.2015, №555/2015. Ofitsijnyj visn. Ukrainy. 2015. №78. 38 p.
Kontseptsia rozvytku sektoru bezpeky i oborony Ukrainy [Conception of development of safety and defense of Ukraine], zatverdzhena Ukazom Prezidenta Ukrainy vid 14 bereznia 2016 roku, №92/2016. Ofitsijnyj visn. Ukrainy, 2016. №23. 12 p.
Сhepkov, I. B. (2019), "Porivnjalnyy analiz system oboronnogo planuvannia v USA ta Ukrainy" [Comparative analysis of defense planning in USA and Ukraine]. Weapons and military equipment, 3(23), pp. 9–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.3(23).3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.3(23).3-15
Slyusar V. І. (2019), "Nova systema doslidzhen i rozrobok sukhoputnuh vijsk SНA" [New system of the researches and developments for USA Army]. Weapons and military equipment, 3(23), pp. 123–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.3(23).123-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.3(23).123-128
Korobchenko S. O. (2019), "Protsess otsinky vytrat za proektamy v NASA" [Assessment NASA projects cost estimating process], Weapons and military equipment, 4(24), pp. 3–11. DOI: https://doi.org/1034169/2414-0651.2019.4(24).3-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.4(24).3-11
Сhepkov I. B. Pershochergovi zavdannia u vijskovotekhnichniy sferi, shcho vyplyvajut iz zakonu Ukrainy “Pro natsionalnu bezpeku Ukrainy” [The first-stage tasks in military and technical sphere, which are arising from Ukrainian law «About national safety of Ukraine»]. Tezy dopovidey VІ Mizhnar. Nauk.-prakt. konf. «Problemy koordynatsii voenno-tekhnichnoi ta oboronno-promyslovoi polityky v Ukraini. Perspektyvy rozvyrku ozbroennia ta vijskovoi tekhniky». TsNDI OVT ZS Ukrainy. 2018. pp. 20–24.
Borokhvostov, V. К. & Riabets, О. М. (2019), "VII Mizhn. nauk.-prakt. konf. «Problemy koordynatsii voennotekhnichnoi ta oboronno-promyslovoi polityky v Ukraini. Perspektyvy rozvyrku ozbroennia ta vijs’kovoi tekhniky»: osnovni pidsumky". Weapons and military equipment, 4(24), pp. 100–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.4(24).100-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2019.4(24).100-114
Uriadovy portal, edynyj web-portal organiv vykonavchoi vlady Ukrainy. Golovna. Novyny vid 11.04.2019. [State portal, joint web-portal of the government agency. Main page. News dated on 11.04.2019]. Elektronnyy resurs. Rezhim dostupu: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/na-zakupivlyu-tamodernizaciyu-ozbroyennya-ta-vijskovoyi-tehniki-u2019-roci-peredbacheno-115-mlrd-grn-minoboroni. Data zvernennya: 13.01.2020.
Zakon Ukrainy “Pro publichni zakupivli” [Law of Ukraine “Public purchasing about]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady. 2016. №9. P. 89.
Borokhvostov, І. V. & Bilokur, M. O. (2018), “Aspekty isnuyuchyh dokumentiv oboronnogo planuvannia shchodo poshuku shliakhiv osnashchennia ozbroenniam vijskovyh formuvan” [Aspects of the defense planning existing documents deal with seeking of the ways on equipping of military formations], Weapons and military equipment, 4(20), pp. 9–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2018.4(20).9-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2018.4(20).9-18
Dochkin, А. G., Lapitskiy, S. V. & Chepkov, І. B. “Porivnjalna otsinka zrazkiv aptillerijskogo ozbroennia za kryteriem “effectyvnist-vartist” [Comparative assessment of the artillery armament samples on criterion «effectiveness-cost»]. АSО. Kyiv: NTC АSО. 2003. № 7. pp. 52–55.
Krukovskiy-Sinevich, К. B. & Polegen’ko, О. F. “Porivnjanlyy analiz sposobiv pidvyshchennia pogodzhenosti matritsi parnyh porivnjan” [Comparative analysis of the methods for upgrading of pair-wise matrix comparison conformance]. Visn. Nats. Aviatsijnogo Un-tu. 2008. Vol. 36. №3. pp. 188–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18372/2306-1472.36.1616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18372/2306-1472.36.1616
Leonov, А. V. & Pronin, А. Yu. Algorithms for formation of list of prospective weapon samples proposed to development and accept on making operational in Russian Federation Army. Elektronnyy nauchn. zhurn. «Vooruzhenie i ekonomika». 2019. №2(48). pp. 13–23.
Senatorov, V. N. (2010), “Metod opredelenia rejtinga artillerijskih kompleksov” [Method for determination of artillery complexes rank], Artillerijskoe i strelkovoe vooruzhenie, № 3(36), pp. 61–64.
“Voennaja ekonomika: upravlenie, planirovanie, voenno-ekonomicheskaja bezopasnost” / Arepin Yu. I. і dr. [Military economics: management, planning, military and economic security]. М.: B. i. 1995. 182 p.
Gary Jones, Erin Ryan, Tony White & Jonathan Ritschel. Investigation into the Ratio of Operating and Support Costs to Life-Cycle Costs for DoD Weapon Systems. Defense ARJ. 2014. № 1(21). Рр. 442–464.
Erin Ryan, John Colombi, D. Jacques, Christine Schubert. A Proposed Methodology to Characterize the Accuracy of Life Cycle Cost Estimates for DoD Programs. Procedia Computer Science. 2012. №8. Рр. 361–369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.01.073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.01.073
Borohvostov, I., Bilokur, N., Kolotukhin, Y. & Tkach, I. Formation of base data list and content for determining of the ways for military teams procurement with armament. J. of Scientific Papers “Social development & Security”. 2019. №2(9), pp. 69–79 DOI: http://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2019.9.2.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2019.9.2.6
Marcel, C. Smit. A North Atlantic Treaty Organization framework for life cycle costing. Intern. J. of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 25:4-5. 2012, pp. 444–456. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/0951192{.2011.562541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2011.562541
Engineering for system assurance in NATO programs. AEP-67 (Ed. 1). February, 2010. 92 p. 22. ААР-20:2015 NATO program management framework (NATO Life Cycle Model) / Ed. C. Version 1. October, 2015. 78 p.
AAP 48 NATO system life cycle and processes. Ed. B. Version 1. March, 2013. 68 p.
ALCCP-1: 2008 NATO guidance on life cycle costs. 76 p.
NATO policy for systems life cycle management. 2006. 5 p.
Cost Structure and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) for Military Systems. (RTO TR-058/SAS-028). September 2003. 104 p.
STANAG 4728 System life cycle management. 2015. 6 p.
STANREC 4755 Reference documents on life cycle costs. 2015. 9 p.
ISO 10303-239 – Industrial automation systems and integration − Product data representation and exchange − Part 239: Application protocol: Product life cycle support. 2012. 65 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Володимир Миколайович Cенаторов,Микола Олександрович Білокур,Євген Анатолійович Колотухін
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
