Trends in ensuring military security in the military technological sphere. World experience of innovative activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2021.4(32).20-25Keywords:
military security of the state, military technological sphere, defense industrial complex, innovationAbstract
In this paper, the authors consider one of the essential components of military security of the state – military technological security, or military security in the military technological sphere. It demonstrates that the essence of the military technological component of military security is to ensure the parity not of force but of security. Particular attention is concentrated on the issues of world experience in intensifying innovation in defense industry. It shows that full consideration of global trends in the development of innovation in the defense industry and critical use of the positive experience of developed countries, especially the United States, is of undoubted practical interest for the development of domestic defense industry. Of course, it is necessary to take full account of the peculiarities of the innovation sphere of Ukraine, its innovation culture and the main competitive advantages. The materials of the article can be useful for specialistsтin the defense sphere of Ukraine at the initial stages of activities aimed at ensureing the current level of military security of the state
Downloads
References
Chepkov, I.B., Zubarev, V.V. & Smirnov, V.O. (2017), Armaments theory. Scientific and technical problems and tasks. Vol. 5. Military technical policy of Ukraine: formation, state and ways of improvement. K. Publishing House of Dmytra Burago. 448. p.
Chepkov, I.B., Zubarev, V.V. & Smirnov, V.O. (2015), Armaments theory. Scientific and technical problems and tasks. Vol. 2. Military technical cooperation in the system of military security of the state. K. Publishing House of Dmytra Burago. 400. p.
Military and economic support of the national security of the Russian Federation in a multipolar world (2009). Ed. by R.A. Faramazan. M. IMEMO RAN.
Managing Technological Risk (2001). P. 6.
U.S. House of Representatives. Committee on Science. Unlocking our Future: Toward a New National Science Policy (Wach D.C.: GPO.) 1998. Pp. 39—40.
Managing Technical Risk (2001). P. 4.
Lewis, M. Branscomb, Fumio Kodama & Richard Florida. (1999), Industrializing Knowledge (Cambridge MA: MIT Press). Or: Managing Technical Risk. Concluding Remarks. P. 50.
Managing Technical Risk. Concluding Remarks. P. 50.
Josh Lerner. Venture Capital and Academic Technology in Industrializing Knowlerdge, loc. Cit Nable 1. P. 387. Or: Managing Technical Risk. Concluding Remarks. P. 50.
R.W. Rycroft & Don. E. Kash. Managing Complex Networks - Key to 21 Century Innovation Suscess. Research and Technology Management. Vay-June 1999. P. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1999.11671278
Dosi, Giovanni & Bruce Kogut (1993), National Specificities and the Contex of Change: the coevaluation of Organization and Technology. Pp. 249—262 in Kogut, Bruce ed., Century Competitiveness: Technology and the Organization of Work, New York: Oxford University Press.
Pankova, L.V. (2006). An innovative component of the US military economy. M. IMEMO RAN. P. 44.
Managing Technological Risk (2001). P. 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/cp.v2001.n1.3066
Managing Technical Risk. Concluding Remarks (2001). P. 49.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Олег Володимирович Докучаєв, Марія Вікторівна Бондарчук, Катерина Андріївна Кучинська

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.