Analytical parameters of the decision-making process concept in a multidomain conflict

Authors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2026.2(50).125-130
Keywords:
Array, Array, Array, Array, Array, Array, Array
Abstract

The article investigates the concept of integrated management decision support in multi-domain operations based on a data-driven governance approach (using the Palantir platform as a model). Drawing on graph, vector-matrix, and probabilistic models, a methodology for the multi-criteria evaluation of decision-making effectiveness is applied. It establishes that integral management effectiveness relies on data integration and relevance, decision timeliness, and the system's resilience under conditions of degradation and information overload. The scientific novelty lies in the development of a system of analytical parameters for assessing management effectiveness. The research results can be utilized to improve defense planning and crisis response within the security and defense sector.

Author Biographies
  1. Oleksandr Rakhmanyi , Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

    PhD

  2. Serhii Bazarnyi, National Defence University of Ukraine

    PhD

  3. Oleksandr Ternovyi, National University of Defence of Ukraine

    PhD Student

References

Kramer, F., Dailey, A. M., & Brodfuehrer, J. A. (2024). NATO multidomain operations: Near- and medium-term priority initiatives. Atlantic Council Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security. URL:

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/NATO-multidomain-operations-Near-and-medium-term-priority-initiatives.pdf.

“Ministerstvo oborony Ukrainy. Ukraina pershoiu v sviti vidkryvaie dlia partneriv dostup do trenuvannia AI-modelei na realnykh danykh z polia boiu. Ofitsiinyi vebportal MOU” [Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. (2026, March 12). Ukraine is the first in the world to open access to partners for training AI models on real battlefield data. Official web portal of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine]. Available at:

https://mod.gov.ua/news/ukrayina-pershoyu-v-sviti-vidkrivaye-dlya-partneriv-dostup-do-trenuvannya-ai-modelej-na-realnih-danih-z-polya-boyu.

Aerospace & Defence. (2026, March 26). German Army Eyes AI To Expedite Wartime Decision-Making. Aerospace & Defence News. URL:

https://www.aerospace-and-defence.com/german-army-ai-expedite-wartime-decisions/.

Monarcha-Matlak, A. (2021). Automated decision-making in public administration. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2077–2084. URL:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.215

Rizk, A., & Lindgren, I. (2024). Automated Decision-Making in the Public Sector: A Multidisciplinary Literature Review. Electronic Government. EGOV 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14841, 237–253. Springer, Cham. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_15

Schmeling, J., Al Dakruni, S., & Mergel, I. (2025). Data collaboration in digital government research: A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 42(3), 102063. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102063

Downey, A. (2025). The alibi of AI: algorithmic models of automated killing. Digital War, 6(1). URL: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-025-00105-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-025-00105-7

Csernatoni, R., Broeders, D., Andersen, L. H., & Schwarz, E. (2025). Myth, Power, and Agency: Rethinking Artificial Intelligence, Geopolitics and War. Minds and Machines, 35(3). URL:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-025-09741-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-025-09741-0

Kern, L., Gustafson, K., & Hansen, M. E. (2026). Leveraging data science to investigate intelligence failures. Intelligence and National Security. URL:

https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2025.2607374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2025.2607374

Feng, R. et al. (2025). Data-driven governance: Developing evaluation indices for China's intelligent political and legal systems. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101207. URL:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101207

Broeders, D., Sukumar, A., Kello, M., & Andersen, L. H. (2025). Digital corporate autonomy: geo-economics and corporate agency in conflict and competition. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 32(4), 1189-1213. Advance online publication. URL:

https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2468308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2468308

Javadi, M. (2025). Infrastructural entanglement and cloud hyperscalers in contemporary warfare: Insights from Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan. Contemporary Security Policy, 47(2), 1–38. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2025.2593247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2025.2593247

Bode, I., Nadibaidze, A., Watts, T. F. A., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Ensuring the exercise of human agency in AI-based military systems: concerns across the lifecycle. Ethics and Information Technology, 27(4). URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09861-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09861-2

NATO Allied Command Transformation. (2024). Multi-Domain Operations: 2024 Report. NATO ACT Publications. https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024-MDO-Report-LR.pdf.

“Husak, Yu. A., Bazarnyi, S. V. Metod optymalnoho upravlinnia stiikistiu derzhavnoi systemy yak skladnoho dynamichnoho obiekta v bahatodomennomu prostori. Enerhetychnyi front: shostyi teatr voiennykh dii (stratehiia zakhystu, upravlinnia ta vidnovlennia)” [Husak, Y. A., Bazarnyi, S. V. Method of optimal management of state system resilience as a complex dynamic object in a multi-domain space. Energy Front: The Sixth Theater of War (Strategy of Defense, Management and Recovery)]. (Kyiv, March 27, 2026). 2026. pp. [63-66]. URL: https://ipme.kiev.ua/konferencii/energy-front-2026/.

Mathematical model of multi-domain interaction based on game theory / S. Bazarnyi, Y. Husak, T. Voitko, F. Aliew, S. Yevseiev. Advanced Information Systems. 2025. Vol. 9, No. 3. P. 22–31.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2025.3.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2025.3.03

Meerveld, H., & Lindelauf, R. (2024). Data Science in Military Decision-Making: Foci and Gaps. Global Society, 39(1), 1–27.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2024.2353657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2024.2353657

Mattingsdal, J. (2025). When seconds count: a data-driven exploration of military leaders’ performance in simulated irregular warfare. Small Wars & Insurgencies. URL:

https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2025.2588440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2025.2588440

“Zhyvotovskyi, R. (2026). Rozroblennia metodyky formalizatsii danykh dlia pobudovy tsyfrovykh dviinykiv zasobiv povitrianoho napadu. Ozbroiennia ta viiskova tekhnika” [Zhyvotovskyi, R. (2026). Development of a data formalization methodology for constructing digital twins of air attack assets. Armament and Military Equipment], 49(1), 76–83. URL: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2026.1 (49), 76–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2026.1(49).76-83

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-06-30
Issue
Vol. 50 No. 2 (2026): Weapons and Military Equipment
Section
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
License

Copyright (c) 2026 Oleksandr Rakhmanyi,Serhii Bazarnyi,Oleksandr Ternovyi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Analytical parameters of the decision-making process concept in a multidomain conflict. (2026). Weapons and Military Equipment, 50(2), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2026.2(50).125-130

Most read articles by the same author(s)